Oh <insert deity here> what have they done?!?!?

14 replies [Last post]
iostream
iostream's picture
Offline
Joined: 25/09/2003

Continuing the theme of "new designs", the new LUU foyer was open today. To be kind, I don't like it.

It appears to be decorated by committee, with an attempt at "minimalist" with someone bottling it and vomiting crap picture frames all over the walls.

It has turned several small and functional spaces into one massive useless cavern. This from a organisation that is perpetually saying that it is short on space.

The flooring is equally daft with faux-slate-tiles-yet-obviously-clip-together-laminate-boards in some areas, and seemingly at random going into some freakish artex-meets-black-rubber concoction that looks like it will turn the whole area into "the slippy-slidy show!" every time it rains during term time and the water gets stampeded in.

Back to the walls and there is now what shall henceforth known as the "ego wall" where the exec have their mugs painted on the about 1000 times larger than such would need.

It appears they attempted to open the space up, yet I am guessing for structural reasons, there is now a strange cube in the middle of the foyer. Not only does it look out of place, it completely destroys any reasoning of improving the flow of people in the foyer, as the corridor to the shops is still as narrow as it was previously.

One of the more useful parts of the foyer did not appear to be there - the post box.

Moving on from the foyer, Game On has gone. While I guess it isn't going to be overly missed as it was never properly provisioned as an arcade in the first place. It is now "The Lounge" and the old lounge appears to be "yet more lounge" yet curiously locked (I peered in through the window in the door connecting "old lounge" to "old game on"). Also, the meeting rooms of "the old lounge" have been removed. to make space for a larger "yet more lounge". Oh, and the all of it is green. a vile shade of green between pus-green and gangrene-green. With complementary shades of different vile greens. For the seating and tables, you have a wonderful selection of poo-brown, puke-brown or... yet more green! Oh, and about 50% of the furniture can be described as being in the "will most likely be wrecked in 6 months time" category. The "yet more lounge area" appears to continue the theme, but has an area that appears to be lino with a grass pattern photoshopped on to it at a zoom level far too high to actually give the impression of grass.

In summary it appears that taste and common sense has been sacrificed for no good reason on a project that had no reason to exist in the first place.

talkToTheHat
talkToTheHat's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/10/2002

I suspect the useful little spaces that societies needed more of were underused because the union made it so impossible to book them so now it will be a case of tribes fighting over corners of the giant cave, or going somewhere else where the beer is cheaper... It really did feel like walking through the foyer of prospering conglomerate desperate to tell the world just how much money it can extract from customers and turn into real estate and shareholder value...

__________________

I am not a Legend, I'm just in exile for playing keys.

Northerner
Northerner's picture
Offline
Joined: 14/03/2005

It is a post-modernist hell-maze of epic proportions. On the upside I think the post box may have just been moved, I recall seeing it down near Jaldi Jaldi et al. I'll have a proper check though.

Bestes
Bestes's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/10/2008

The post box has indeed been moved downstairs, next to Santander.
Which is also next to the new Helpdesk. As in they need help to find a better place, because the new location is just silly.
I'd rather have the sweet shop back.

And Union Books' closing down is confirmed.

__________________

42



Omnia Mutantur Nihil Interit

talkToTheHat
talkToTheHat's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/10/2002

Bestes wrote:
And Union Books' closing down is confirmed.

I suppose students don't want books any more?

__________________

I am not a Legend, I'm just in exile for playing keys.

iostream
iostream's picture
Offline
Joined: 25/09/2003

not at their prices. Essentially the shop was making a loss for the last few years as most students now buy their books online. I think I heard it was discussed for Borders to take over the shop but they didn't see how they could do anything better enough to take the place back into profit. From what I understand Borders will be taking over as the "course notes" seller.

So while I imagine there will be moans, I concur with the management on this issue and think it was the best business decision for the overall good of the union.

Bestes
Bestes's picture
Offline
Joined: 01/10/2008

Borders?

I thought they had closed down, in Leeds at least.

__________________

42



Omnia Mutantur Nihil Interit

iostream
iostream's picture
Offline
Joined: 25/09/2003

They had. I meant that other book shop beginning with B - Blackwells.

livelifetotheverymax
livelifetotheverymax's picture
Offline
Joined: 27/09/2010

That's a shame. For some books Union Books avec staff discount worked out cheaper than most places.

About the new foyer: it's a nightmare trying to evict everyone from the union on a night, or even to get them in at the start of the night. Most annoying if you have to walk through the riot quite regularly as part of your job.

Basically many many thousands of pounds spent that didn't actually need spending. Ah well.

Oh yea, is it worth having a sweepstake on how many of those pictures have been robbed by the end of the term? From memory two have gone already.

On the plus side, even though the food in terrace is overpriced it is actually quite good.

Whilst we're talking about development for development's sake, what was the point in changing outside the front of the union? It now looks similar to what I imagine high end financial districts look like rather than the perfectly serviceable and more homely space it's replaced.

It would have been nice to see the uni investing in what we're actually paying them for (education) rather than spending it on POINTLESS improvements which aren't actually an improvement on what was there before. (Did anyone else notice that at the end of the last term they replaced all the Leeds University signs on the entrances around campus with some that look almost exactly the same as the old ones?)

/rant

darkish_angel87
darkish_angel87's picture
Offline
Joined: 17/10/2005

what's annoyed me most if the signs in Essentials telling people where everything is. It's hardly the ASDA in Pudsey; if you need help finding something in there, you shouldn't be allowed to attend university! I understand this probably wasn't much of an expense, but it's wasteful spending nonetheless

__________________

"This racist lady won't let us play catch!"

iostream
iostream's picture
Offline
Joined: 25/09/2003

The improvements are justified by the following logic, as it has been logic of the uni doing expensive pointless things for a while now.

Leeds University has set itself the target of being in the top 50 universities in the world by 2015 (it usually hovers between 110th and 85th).

After "extensive research" they seem to have concluded that the way to do this is by increasing perceived quality and hoping this will attract better staff and students turning the perception of quality into actual quality.

This means that they spent eye-watering sums of money in a re-branding exercise. I think the majority of students these days may not recognise the old logo, which looked like this:

and replaced it with this:

The next step appears to be making everything look pretty with projects such as the paving in front of the union, the new signs etc.

I also bet that some of the £8million the university gives to the union is to make sure the union is keeping up appearances too, as the referendum point that authorised the renovation work was a one-liner in a motion that was written in (I bet deliberately) obtuse language with the resultant question being something like "do you want the spaces in the union building to be improved?" (and with it being the union they can implicitly claim incompetence of not testing the language of the question to make sure it wasn't leading)

Think I am making stuff up? My source is the vice chancellor:
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/identitymanagement/foreword.htm

Northerner
Northerner's picture
Offline
Joined: 14/03/2005

To be a little fair to the Union and the University in any big organisation the capital expenditure is usually seperate from everything else; so the money for building work goes in a different pot right from the start, and some of the sources of the money explicitly state that it can only be used in captial building projects. My main gripe is not that they are renovating the University infrastructure but more they way they have gone about it. All effort seems to have gone into something that meets a certain idiom of upmarket modern design without any consideration as to how the based is used and could best be used; the union foyer being a prime example.

Bella
Bella's picture
Offline
Joined: 19/10/2009

And carpeting perhaps the ONLY room that we can use for dance!!!!! grrrr they have mucked the dance societies over! leaving us all very angry!

Northerner
Northerner's picture
Offline
Joined: 14/03/2005

I noticed that as well, there is a very small square of lino in each room of the new lounge; neither of which is big enough for dance. Additionally a room has effectively been lost with the relocation of the infopoint to where the job place used to be, and the opening up of the foyer.

Bella
Bella's picture
Offline
Joined: 19/10/2009

well, they have permission to use the new foyer area, except, we cant use the space due to our shoes =( not good... as we will scuff the floor. the only place decent for us now is the conference hall or the riley smith, and everyone knows how hard it is not to be kicked out of those 2 rooms